Very odd citing a disgruntled political journalist in an magazine on Economics?

Re: One of the better post-mortems of the Republican Party that I've read -- Church Lady
Posted by chupajuevos , Thu, Nov 20, 2008, 08:31:35 Post ReplyTop of ThreadReviews by chupajuevosFirst Amendment Message BoardMain BigDoggie.net site
So the Repoobs vanish from the scene for a few years then what? How disgruntled will the writer be in four years when boobam fails to at least act right in times of crisis and opens the door for the Marxist party's entry next go round?

He states bush "refused to grapple with the intricacies of the financial meltdown". One must assume an author writing in the e "Economist" knows the Federal Reserve operates as an independently chartered entity which only appears to take orders from politicians publicly, when in fact it takes orders from no one. If so then you should ask yourself how can this writer be so naive as to suggest Bush had any influence over the chief bankers behind the financial fiasco?

It's already been reported many times on the above issues who the criminal activity has been attributed to. It was the really higher intelligence alien life found on Wall street who created it along with the top bankers backing them.

Blaming it on prior political misfeasance is to suggest that this next guy in office has a remedy. I don't see it. What I do see is the next guy in line currently running scared and panicking to the extent he is turning to the same criminal element for a solution.

I suppose obama's own are further from the truth in his time of need is why this is so.


| Edit | Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Support Original Message Top of Thread Current page
Replies to this message