Harvard Study: "..Media has been Negatively Biased against Trump.."

Posted by Iron Worker , Sat, Dec 09, 2017, 20:46:37 Post Reply Reviews by Iron WorkerFirst Amendment Message BoardMain BigDoggie.net site

. . .

Question:  Is CNN biased against Trump?

Answer:  Is the Pope a Catholic?  Do wild bears shit in the woods?


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-trump-media-coverage-harvard-kass-0521-20170519-column.html

 

CNN is overcompensating for almost single handedly helping Trump win the Republican nomination (with an assist from NBC) and so wracked with guilt over it that they have become the full time Trump and Russia, Trump and Russia, Trump and Russia news station.

But now Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy has come out with a study of media coverage of the Trump White House in its first 100 days.

It is astonishing because it comes from Harvard, not exactly the bedrock of American conservatism.

The study found that in Trump's first 100 days in office, the tone of the news coverage of the president has been a whopping 80 percent negative to 20 percent positive.

CNN and NBC struck a 93 percent negative tone on their Trump stories, with only 7 percent positive. CBS was third in the anti-Trump race, with a 91 to 9 ratio.  And the "pro-Trump" Fox News?  That network was 52 percent negative to 48 percent positive.


Credits:  

Susann Moy (Quora) and

John Kass (Chicago Tribune) and

Lots of pointy-headed pinko-commie liberals at Harvard, and

A few real Amerikans at the "Media Research Center" (http://www.mrc.org/)

. . .

 

Uploaded file
Media_Trump.jpg  



| Edit | Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Support View All   Current page
Replies to this message