"private ballots" ??

Re: So much for "private ballots" -- RichAndPretty
Posted by Loquitur , Wed, Dec 13, 2017, 15:46:45 Post ReplyTop of ThreadReviews by LoquiturFirst Amendment Message BoardMain BigDoggie.net site

No "secrecy" applicable to the "Australian ballot" appears to have been violated. The "secrecy" applies to content of said ballot (for "whom" or "what" said franchisee "voted"; or...in this case...sought to vote) - NOT the exercise (or...in this case...aborted attempt to exercise). The result reported in this instance (re: Melania & Ivanka) ? No different than had they been turned away...AT THE POLLS...for lack of proper registration. TOOT TOOT. L.

| Edit | Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Support Original Message Top of Thread Current page
Replies to this message