|Posted by CPMariner , Thu, Dec 21, 2017, 17:14:06||Post Reply||Reviews by CPMariner||First Amendment Message Board||Main BigDoggie.net site|
However, violence did occur. Broken shop windows, claims of objects thrown at the police and etc. The facts of the ensuing arrests as presented at trial were that a selected group of over 200 people were cordoned off and arrested en masse.
Of that group, 20 have since pled guilty to various levels of rioting charges, but the rest are defending themselves on assertions that they attempted no property damage or personal injury, and that although they were protesting, they had no part in such crimes. They did not, however, disengage from the group when acts of property damage occurred, and many claim they didn't even know how or by whom such damage was being inflicted.
But the prosecution took an interesting (perhaps novel) position that by merely "being there" and not "disengaging" from the protestors when it seemed apparent that property damage was occurring, the defendants were guilty of some definition of "conspiracy". Or perhaps I misheard or the narrator misspoke, and it was "complicity".
The first "batch" of six defendants was found not guilty.
|| Edit | Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Support||View All Current page|
|Replies to this message|